The Weaponization of Language

The elimination of critical thinking by limiting language creates stupidity that will then be used against you

Here is a phrase we are all familiar with: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. This sentence may apply on a third grade playground but it falls apart in actual reality, a place where words and language are being used as a weapon to create false belief systems and widespread confusion among the general public. Compounding this problem is what I call the post-literate society that we live in…the average American citizen has a very limited vocabulary (it has been claimed that 54% of American adults can’t read above a sixth grade level), and because of this cannot express themselves clearly in many instances. This also makes them very susceptible to euphemistic language and clever slogans…which almost always leads to deception. The concept that I wish to convey here is best summed up in this quote that is displayed on my office wall and has been here for over ten years: Command of language will prognosticate aptitude. Facility with words bespeaks a capacity to learn relationships and grasp concepts; it is a means of access to the complex reality.

We do indeed live in an extremely complex reality. And unnecessarily so, as we have exceedingly complicated ways of doing simple things, and when these things fail to perform our solution is often times more complexity. This is the doom loop created by a lack of critical thinking that in many instances was preceded by poor language skills. This leads to fallacious belief systems that can only be supported by slogans, euphemisms. and when that fails, magical thinking.

It has been said that words are the atomic structure of both truth and lies. Here we could invoke the double edged sword analogy…it cuts both ways, and so do words. So, words do matter, they are very powerful, and can cause you immense harm when used against you. If someone wants to deceive you, words will be the primary tool. When torture becomes “enhanced interrogation” and the killing of innocent people becomes “collateral damage” we should quickly realize that we are being lied to…but many believed. Are these people stupid? No, not in every case (some are) but they have been made stupid by being discouraged from engaging in any form of critical analysis and now will passively accept almost anything that they are told by an “authority figure.”

This is the consensus reality, an artificial construct that was created primarily with words, and has been described as this: The shared agreement (among any societal group) as to what is “real,” what is happening, and what things mean. The controllers that are managing this version of reality that we live in have created a hive-mind of sorts among the general public that is very similar to hypnosis in its presentation. It is here that many people of reasonable intelligence, but with poor reading skills and because of this are not fully literate, can become trapped by their own inability to engage in critical thinking, creating a condition that we could call collective stupidity. When one is buried deep inside this constructed reality, questions of truth will never even arise; this is a false reality designed to keep you inside of it and never question its validity. What we call “mainstream” economic theory and religion are very good examples of the phenomenon, where extreme euphemisms, incomprehensible jargon, and “magical thinking” are often employed and keep one trapped inside a false narrative.

Poor reading skills leads to poor literacy, and from here one can be fooled with a tactic referred to as semantical redefinition. One of my favorite examples of this is the word “proactive.” What does this mean? Seizing the initiative; action taken to check other action beforehand? That sounds about right, but the problem here is this is the definition of the word “preemption,” not proactive, taken from a dictionary printed in 1984…that did not even include the word proactive, because it did not exist.

“Pro” means “in favor of,” so proactive actually means “in favor of activity.” No wonder nothing ever gets done…I can be in favor of something, but that does not mean that I will actually do anything.

What about the word “nationalism,” it means patriotic…right? Here’s what the 1984 dictionary says: 1. a) devotion to ones nation; patriotism b) excessive, narrow, or jingoistic patriotism, chauvinism. And then this: 2. the doctrine that national interests, security, etc. are more important than international considerations.

The average person does not know the difference between patriotism and nationalism, and would stare at you blankly if you used the word jingoistic. This person would also tell you that a chauvinist is a man that wants his wife to clean house and cook. This is pathetic, and the semi-literate are sheep to the slaughter because they are easily herded with slogans, such as, “My country right or wrong.”

Nationalism can be more accurately defined as this: A system that teaches one to hate people they do not know, and to be proud of things they did not do. We can see this “dictated behavior” outside of politics with “sportsball” mania (three ball choices here: foot, basket, or base) and “rooting” for your team, where one might attend a “watch party” to demonstrate their loyalty. Your compliance can also be displayed by wearing a shirt with someone else’s name on it. If your city does not have a team you can choose the team of another city and then “hate” someone that chose differently...and maybe settle the score with a fist fight in the parking lot of the sports bar.

Wouldn’t this be a hate crime? Not in this case…physical violence when not in self defense is already illegal. I hate broccoli…is this not a hate crime. No, you are “allowed” to hate broccoli, but if I were to physically assault you for liking/eating broccoli it would be a criminal act. But not a hate crime, even though it involved “hate.”

So, we can infer that some types of hate are permissible, while other types are extra/double criminal. Here, we see the weaponization of language with an extremely simple and common word - hate - and the far reaching ramification that this type of weaponization can produce. Let’s do some critical thinking…

What does the word hate mean? The 1984 dictionary says this: 1. to have a strong dislike or ill will for; loath; despise 2. to dislike or wish to avoid; shrink from.

Logical question: How could the dislike of something be criminal? Technically it is not, we are allowed to dislike things…like broccoli. I did a search of this question, “Examples of hate crime” and this is what I got: Hate crimes are standard offenses—such as assault, vandalism, or harassment—committed with a bias motive against a victim’s actual or perceived race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The defining element is the bias motivation, which can result in enhanced penalties compared to the underlying crime alone.

Okay, so what is this rather ambiguous term bias motivation? Search results: Bias motivation refers to the psychological drive that influences how individuals perceive, interpret, and act on information, often stemming from personal desires, goals, or the need to maintain a positive self-image. It is distinct from general cognitive biases, which arise from limitations in information processing; instead, motivational biases are distortions consciously or unconsciously driven by one's incentives, emotions, or self-interest.

The above definition of bias motivation is well written and crafted with intelligence…whoever wrote that is no dummy. It also is so vague that it actually says nothing. I have a personal desire to keep gas in my car, and according to the above this is both a bias motivation (it would make me look stupid if I ran out of gas with money in my pocket) and a general cognitive bias (I don’t know how far away the next gas station is…this is a limitation of information processing) - which it claims are two different things. Furthermore, a “motivational bias” can occur at the subconscious level, meaning that someone is doing a particular “thing” while not being fully aware why they did it. What this “definition” actually is, in spite of the fact that it does contain elements of truth, can be best described with slang…it’s gobbledygook…and can be found in corporate “mission statements” nation wide.

A hate crime is nothing more than a “semantical creation” and was meant to pave the way for the mother of all semantical creations (drum roll please)………………………. Antisemitism (voice of woman screaming while frantically clutching her pearls, here).

We all know that being called an antisemite is the kiss of death in American politics, with that fear extending all the way down to the man on the street…Joe Sixpack does not want to be seen as antisemitic. If I were to ask the common person what is an antisemite, I would more than likely get this answer - “It means you hate Jews.” I could clean this answer up just a little bit and make it more clear…they think it means you dislike Jews. My next question would be…what is wrong with that? It is perfectly fine to dislike Catholics, or Protestants, or Muslims…we could throw in Buddhists and Hindus as well.

Let’s take this term - antisemite - apart, and examine its meaning. What is a Semite? The 1984 dictionary says this: 1. a person regarded as descended from Shem 2. a member of any of the peoples speaking a Semitic language, including the Hebrews, Arabs, Assyrians, Phoenicians, etc. 3. same as Jew: loose usage.

Okay, first off…no one alive today can claim to be a descendent of Shem, the first son of Noah…maybe we should just scratch out this meaning. What is made clear by the above definition is that a Semite is someone that speaks a particular language, and that calling a Jew a Semite is…slang…which is the same as “loose usage.”

One could argue that the Jews of Israel speak Hebrew, making them qualify for the Semitic label. Well, not all of them do, and English is used in Israeli media, education and business affairs. American, European and Russian Jews do not speak Hebrew, as far as I know. The Jews of Iran speak Farsi…making the non-Semites. Furthermore, Hebrew was a dead language until the late 19th century, and was “resurrected” for the a single purpose of the Zionist/ Jewish colonial project that became official in 1948…what we now call Israel. Here is what we can walk away with: Calling someone a Semite just because they claim to be Jewish is, as mentioned above…loose usage, and not necessarily true or factual.

However, Palestinians speak Arabic and are actual Semites. “Kill all Arabs” is a commonly used phrase among the Israeli population…this is not antisemitism? Just who is the antisemite here? The Palestinians of Gaza are being removed in a live-streamed genocide…but it is called “self defense.” Gangs of religiously radical Israelis are slowly invading the West Bank and forcing Palestinians from their homes using violence…but they are called “settlers.”

This is semantical redefinition, and we can see how effective this simple little trick has been on the barely literate and those that are incapable of critical thinking. But poor literacy and a lack of critical thinking does not necessarily mean stupid…but you can make them stupid with constant distractions, like endless sports coverage, fashion (everyone wants to be attractive, right?) and a never ending stream of useless information…trivia that seems important.

I think this might be the very pinnacle of mindless behavior, and is certainly an example of the created hive mind here in the United States, that was created by and continually reenforced through main stream media. Both popular media outlets and the US government are controlled by the very people that brought us the pejorative antisemite…these are the Zionists. But if you state the above, that the Zionists have total control of our media and our government you will be called an antisemite, which has been labeled a hate crime. In this case it does not matter that any criticism of Zionism is supported by demonstrable fact…you are now guilty of “hate.” You can dislike broccoli, but it is not permissible to dislike Zionism.

This is duplicity, a word that the average person will not understand. Here is the definition from1984: 1) Deliberate deceptiveness in behavior or speech. 2) An instance of deliberate deceptiveness; double-dealing.

The duplicity in this broccoli/Zionism issue is quite plain too see and the logic here is extraordinarily simple…extensive critical thinking is not needed to see this and a third grader, juice box in hand, could readily understand. This brings us to another form of weaponized language, and it centers around ignorance and a limited vocabulary…if you have never heard a particular word, how could you possibly know what it means?

And that word is Zionism. To the best of my knowledge, I have never ever, not once, heard or seen this word used in mainstream media. Through the years I have asked various people if they were aware of this word; so far I have found only one person that was aware of this term (hat tip to Angela), everyone else was clueless. To their credit they have heard the word Zion, but had no idea of what it meant.

Zionism, from the 1984 dictionary: a movement formally for reestablishing, now for supporting, the Jewish national state of Israel.

Notice that in the above there is no mention of the Protocols of Zion, a printed document that amounts to a manifesto for world domination. The Greater Israel project is also not mentioned but was certainly in existence in 1984. When we take a look around us and the state of world affairs in the present day we can clearly see that the Protocols are nearly complete (if the document is fake, then someone used it as an instruction manual) and the Greater Israel project is moving forward…and largely paid for by you, the American taxpayer.

Things that are not mentioned is another form of weaponized language that have taken on a different form…silence. When the Israelis are asked about their nuclear weapons program, we get this - “We will neither confirm or deny.” In other words…silence.

Let’s take a closer look at this neither confirm or deny thing. Failure to deny something is a de facto admission. It is the same as to say, “yes, we have nuclear weapons, but I am not going to show them to you…there will be no confirmation.”

Currently, we are in what President Trump has called “a little excursion” to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. First off…this is not an excursion, but rather an “incursion” and is what we would usually call a “war.” But we aren’t calling it that. The Iranians have been labeled as “terrorists” for retaliation to an unproved US-Israeli attack - self defense is being called terrorism. This question arises: Who is the actual terrorist? Let’s go to the 1984 dictionary…

Terrorism: 1) the act of terrorizing; use of force or threats to demoralize, intimidate, and subjugate, esp. the use as a political weapon or policy.

If I were to publicly suggest that the US government is using terrorism to advance the political goal of a foreign country that is Israel (the Greater Israel project, a massive land grab) I would be attacked as both unpatriotic and antisemitic. But in fact, this is demonstrably true and can be proven beyond any reasonable doubt.

This is the weaponization of language…and the above form of this weapon that is being used to defend the US fealty to Israel (which is simply words and phrases) has a term to describe it: Thought-terminating cliché, and is defined as this…

A thought-terminating cliché is a form of loaded language, often masquerading as folk wisdom, designed to end an argument and bypass cognitive dissonance with a simplistic phrase rather than a substantive point. The term was popularized by psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton in his 1961 book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, who described such language as the “language of non-thought.”

Key Characteristics

Function: It compresses complex human problems into brief, reductive, definitive-sounding phrases that serve as the start and finish of ideological analysis.

Mechanism: These clichés stop discussion by signaling that the topic is closed, minimizing emotions, and discouraging further curiosity or critical thinking.

Context Dependency: A phrase may be harmless in one context (e.g., accepting bad weather) but thought-terminating in another if used to block discussion of fixable problems or dismiss dissent.

Common Examples

“It is what it is“: A tautology implying situations are static and not worth discussing.

“It’s not that deep“: Dismisses criticism by asserting critical thinking is unnecessary.

“Let’s agree to disagree“: Used to halt conversation rather than resolve it.

“There are worse things in life“: Insinuates the current issue is insignificant.

“Doubt is of the devil“: Religious phrase used to ward off forbidden or uncomfortable thoughts.

Applications and Criticism

Totalism and Politics: Lifton identified these as a hallmark of totalist environments, including historical examples like Nazi Germany and Communist China, where they restrict freedom of speech and justify actions without examination.

Religion: Critics note their use in Christianity (e.g., “God works in mysterious ways”) and Scientology to condition members, reaffirm confirmation bias, and alienate those not of the faith.

Fiction: George Orwell’s Newspeak in Nineteen Eighty-Four and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World utilize similar concepts to eliminate “dangerous” words or enforce societal stability.

So we can see how people of normal intelligence that are functionally literate can be made to accept non-sense…you have to speak to them in ways that will stop any kind of analysis or critical thinking…as in the language of non-thought, first identified in 1961.

But a program to “make people stupid” was in place long before 1961 and had been pointed out by others after extensive research…nobody listened. Presently, this “program” has made astonishing progress in the last twenty five years, and then started to go exponential around 2010…which correlates with the introduction of the “smart phone” and other digital gizmos, sold to you as convenience, so you do not have to think anymore.

Thinking is hard work, so, let “us” do it for you (trust me bro) because “we have an app for that.”

We are now on the brink of a complete breakdown of American society, what could be called a civilizational psychosis, a “nervous breakdown “ of sorts with the lemmings charging headlong to the cliffs edge. Not only has the publics ability to think in any kind of analytical way been compromised, their attention span has been destroyed as well. Then just add constant distractions, economic concerns, and a rotating “crisis cycle” and what results is a “basket case” mentality of the general public.

And let me point out that your so-called leaders come from the general public as well, and are simply not equipped for the task ahead of them. Someone recently made this comment regarding out “political class”: They see people jumping to their death from a burning building and they identify the problem as…jumping.

We can see a similar phenomenon with the public outrage against these so-called data centers. People have flooded county commissioners meetings in protest about these “data cities,” citing quality of life and environmental issues…which are valid concerns. Here we find another “can’t see the forest for the trees” type problem. No one is questioning why something like this is even needed. Why would anyone need to aggregate quantities of data so vast? This question is never asked.

The answer to the question never asked is simple; the data centers are the buildout of the coming “beast system,” a system of total control. And this raises another question…why can’t the general public see this thinly veiled monstrosity?

This is not so much a problem of literacy and lack of critical analysis…this is the result of a population that has been trained over decades of time to “not think at all” with severe punishment of the few that “do think” and engage in abstract analysis. This is the psy/op that has been run on populations of the West, and the United States in particular, which is best described as a slow process (over one hundred years here in the US) of mental conditioning that has created the consensus reality that is like a steel trap for the mind, and it works rather well after inducing a mild “trance-like” state…think “screen time” that began innocently enough in the 1950’s.

Once one is inside this cognitive trap, this invisible jailcell of ones own mind, strict obedience to “authority” has been imprinted on the subconscious mind and occurs naturally just like heartbeat and respiration…things we do without any conscious thought or effort. From here, all the decisions about your quality of life and personal aspirations have been handed over to a ruling class that exists in a so-called “legal system” (of their creation) that will not punish them for being “wrong.”

The fact that the United States is in a precarious position has not been missed by the general public or the so-called ruling class. Everyone is certainly aware that all is not well. The reason that nothing ever changes is that we are simply attacking the symptoms of our actual problems…never the root causes.

The root cause of all this dysfunction, whether it be political or the numerous societal/cultural problems that we have can be summed up in one word, that word that the average person has never heard…Zionism. We are living in what has been named, and then given an acronym, ZOG: Zionist Occupied Government.

A citizenry that has been kept ignorant and is not fully literate, has poor critical thinking skills and has been trained to not think by the “language of non-think,” and then fed propaganda as “news” for decades, will have great difficulty understanding that their government is under occupation. To the average person an occupation is done militarily, with foreign troops on our own soil parading around in tanks and jeeps…as seen on TV. In reality this is the most difficult are rarely successful way to take over a foreign country…any success will be difficult to maintain, and is therefore short lived.

The Zionist were well aware of this, as they had taken control of the UK centuries ago by simply controlling banking…not a shot fired and no military needed. The United States was to be the next target, and it was to be done in a slow, incremental way, drop by drop, and would be a generational affair. We are now approaching the end of the program and complete collapse is now in sight.

Here are some of the major milestones in the Zionist program:

• The 1913 Federal Reserve Act. This so-called “Federal Reserve Bank” is not federal, has no reserves, and is not a bank. Once again we see the public being deceived with simple words. What the Fed actually does is print money on printing presses owned by the Treasury Department, and then lend that money back to the Treasury…with interest. This printed money has no gold backing, which is a violation of the US Constitution (Article 1 sec. 10) and is nothing other than counterfeiting, a criminal offense…but they just gave it other names, like Quantitative Easing and other such semantical nonsense. I should also add that in this very year, 1913, we had the passage of the Federal Income Tax Act, that should be seen as a tax on your very existence…it was the point where we were all quietly sent into slavery of the Zionists, as per the Talmud that repeatedly states that the Goyim (gentile) is to be the slave of the Jew.

• The assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. This is the last real president we ever had and essentially should be seen as when the Zionist captured the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. Kennedy was going after the American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs, which had recently (1959) changed their name to AIPAC, and was trying to force them to register as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA). He was also trying to shut down the Israeli nuclear weapons program. This was a direct threat to the Zionist project and Kennedy was “dealt with” in a brutal public execution that was meant to produce maximum shock to the American psyche and to instruct members of the then sitting government, and future governments, as to who was actually in charge of the United States.

• The 9-11 event. Just as with the Kennedy assassination, this was a joint effort of the CIA and the Israeli Mossad that utilized members of the American government, first to carryout the task, and then conceal its true nature. The purpose of this operation was to get the American people to support the “forever war,” now in its 25 year, in support of the Greater Israel project for Zionist hegemony in the Middle East, and to bring an end to America hegemony, which will occur simply because the United States is insolvent. Right now you are witnessing the Zionist parasite devour the host, which it will then abandon as it moves on to the next victim.

Then there is another aspect of the Zionist occupation that is clearly visible, but no one seems to be able figure out what has actually happened: Government dysfunction… government can’t seem to do anything right and attempts at solving any given problem, whether real or perceived, fails nearly every time and has resulted in levels of “legal” complexity that are almost incomprehensible. Let’s take a look at this problem…

If I were to ask the common person what type of government we have, they would tell me this; we live in a democracy! They would tell you this because they have been hearing this for their entire life, courtesy of the Zionist controlled media. We do not live in a democracy and never have. The Framers knew that a democracy was the worst type of government, as it almost always evolves in into tyrannical, dictatorial system. A democracy is the wants of 51% completely overriding the wants of 49%. A democracy is two wolves and a sheep “voting” on what’s for dinner.

The type of government that was designed by the Framers and ratified in 1791 is a Constitutional Republic, that is democratic in nature. In other words the “people” vote for representatives that are to vote on laws that best represent the needs of the constituency…We the People.

This is not what we have today. What we do have is a fascist oligarchy that is administered by a kakistocracy…and when I point this out to the average person, they stare at me blankly because they don’t know what any of these words mean. Even the anti-fascists (antifa) don’t seem to know, and demonstrate this when they throw bricks at plate glass windows of privately owned businesses…or maybe burn said business to the ground…running a small business is not fascism and at one point was the very backbone of our economy, and attacking this is sheer stupidity.

Let’s go to the 1984 dictionary…

Fascism: A system of government characterized by rigid one-party dictatorship, forcible suppression of opposition, private economic enterprise under centralized control, belligerent nationalism, racism, and militarism, etc. first instituted in Italy in 1922.

Mussolini’s definition of fascism was the merger of state and corporate power, and we can see this in todays world. And we do live under a rigid one-party system that is represented by factions called liberal and conservative that appear to be antagonistic towards one another, but this is simply theater and what we actually have in fact is something being called the uni-party that answers to the Zionist overlords and not the American people. This system is kept alive and functioning primarily through bribery…but we call it a campaign contribution.

Oligarchy ; A form of government in which the ruling power belongs to a few persons.

Oligarchy has also been defined as rule by the elite, for the elite. This is not very democratic, and is certainly not Constitutional, and the average person would readily recognize this if they only knew that the word oligarchy existed.

Kakistocracy: Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens.

The problem we have with government, at all levels, is that it is a kakistocracy, and that we are being ruled by people that are ignorant, incompetent, or just plain stupid and otherwise not qualified to hold these positions. Even the most dim-witted among us could recognize that we do not live in anything even resembling a democracy, but a kakistocracy…if they only knew there was such a word as this.

Zionism is responsible for the form of government that we now have. Zionism is in the process of destroying the America I once knew, has been called a cancer upon humanity, and is devouring the soul of western civilization…the Middle East is currently next on the menu. Our enemy is not Russia, China, or the Iranians…it is Israel and its Zionist supporters that control our government.

We have just crossed a major hurdle in the problem solving process…correctly identifying the root of the problem, and not confusing the symptoms as causation. The problem here is not the false left-right dichotomy, or blue-haired Karen’s, or social justice warriors…it is Zionism and the “Jewish problem.” So, problem solved…right?

Well, not quite, wait just a minute…not so fast. Let’s look a little closer. Not all Zionists claim to be Jewish, and not all Jews support Zionism. There are religiously radical/fanatical Jews in Israel that do harbor xenophobic/ethnocentristic views pertaining to the Gentiles (non-Jews, derogatorily referred to as the Goyim and less that human) but at the same time do not support the territorial expansion of the Greater Israel project. Then there are the Christians that somehow think it is just fine for the Israelis to do anything they want, things like genocide and mass murder, because God said so…this is the purely semantical creation (done with words only) that is Christian Zionism.

The question we have before us now is quite simple: What do the Zionists, the Christian Zionists, and extremely radical Israeli Jews all have in common? Answer: They are all either psychopaths, sociopaths, or narcissists…these are people with psychological disorders…and just for the sake of brevity and simplicity, moving forward we will just refer to these three groups as “psychos.”

Your current reality is being governed by psychos…the inmates are truly running the asylum. Psychos naturally gravitate to positions that give them authority over others, and many times are high functioning individuals, making them at times difficult to separate from the general population and truly authentic human beings. Psychos cannot be allowed to hold positions in law enforcement, the judiciary and government…period, full stop.

For those of us in the Freedom Movement, which would more correctly be called the Sanity Movement…this is our task, removing psychos from positions of authority. When we study our adversary, we find that the primary weapon being used against us is simply words and language.

Words are the most powerful mechanism of mind control in existence, obviating the need for any sophisticated tech. Those who are not aware or do not try to control their own minds are subject to capture and ultimately, enslavement, even if they are physically not in chains. What is needed is a weakened, deluded, unaware target, programmed (by words) to respond predictably to trigger language.

From this we can now see the importance of good language skills and literacy. Without these skills one is easily held inside the cognitive prison of their own mind that is dictated to them by media and other “authority figures.” What should be noted here is that the people around us that are in this mental prison are not necessarily stupid, but rather simply ignorant and poorly educated making them susceptible to the many forms of mind control that exist in todays world. But actual reality is beginning to slap them in the face. It is becoming clear to them that they have been deceived, and on a monumental scale, and this should be seen as an opportunity to pull some of our fellow citizens from the false reality that has been created…sometimes referred to as “The Matrix.”

But we must use caution moving forward. Let me leave you with a little piece of wisdom that is somewhat contradictory and maybe hard to understand: Sometimes good and evil are difficult to discern from one another, one can masquerade as the other, and this can be exemplified with a little Russian humor…

A Siberian fur trapper was moving across the frozen tundra when he came across a songbird whose legs and wings were frozen and unusable…the bird was near death. The trapper picked up the bird and laid it in a fresh pile of steaming dung, and then moved on. The bird realized that this heat would free his legs and wings and began to chirp and sing with joy. A passing wolf heard this singing and approached the bird, and then gobbled him up in one bite.

The moral to the story: The one that put you in the shit is not necessarily your enemy, and the one that gets you out of the shit is not necessarily your friend.

And so we see that good and evil are sometimes difficult to tell apart, and at times could be seen as opposite sides of the same coin…this is the tightrope we are walking and will take a great deal of wisdom to successfully traverse. Wisdom is the ability to see the more complex reality around us that has been camouflaged with false narratives and ignorance…and all of this was done with words and language. Listen closely to the words and phrases that are presented to you by our so-called leaders and ask yourself…what does this really mean? But more importantly, listen to the words…but watch what these people actually do. Did words and deeds align with one another? This will tell the tale.